Selig weighs in on Bucs' recent success
By Rob Biertempfel
Published: Monday, July 2, 2012, 9:40 p.m.
For the second year in a row, the Pirates are in the thick of the NL Central race as the season reaches its midpoint.
The players, coaches, front office and ownership share the credit for the franchise's changing fortunes.
Bud Selig would like to take a bow, too.
On Monday, the commissioner said changes to baseball's economic landscape during his tenure have given Pirates fans reason for optimism.
“If this was still the late ‘90s, this couldn't happen,” Selig said. “But it is happening today.
“The Pirates are really improved and really coming on. It's a manifestation of all the economic changes we've made — and all for the better, I might add.”
Selig was named acting commissioner in 1992 and was officially appointed to the post six years later.
Since then, Major League Baseball's revenues have increased 400 percent and its attendance figures have reached all-time highs.
Selig's most significant move was to implement revenue sharing, which last year led to a transfer of $400 million from larger- to smaller-revenue clubs.
According to documents leaked to the Associated Press in 2010, the Pirates got $34.4 million in 2007 and $32.1 million in 2008 from the revenue-sharing plan.
Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-320-7811.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.