Pirates drawing hefty TV ratings
The first-place Pirates are attracting some giant TV ratings — and not just because they opened a key series against the San Francisco Giants on Friday night.
The Pirates' 2-0 win over the Astros on Thursday night drew 275,000 viewers on Root Sports, their largest audience this season. The total viewership surpassed that of many Penguins games and translated into a strong 9.48 rating.
According to Root senior vice president Shawn McClintock, the Pirates' local ratings are being matched or equaled only by the Tigers, Cardinals and Reds. Some nights, the Pirates are tallying the largest ratings of any major league team.
Complete ratings are available only since 1995, when far fewer games were televised per season, but four of the Pirates' 12 highest-rated games have been this season. The only season with comparable ratings over the past 17 years was 1997, when the Pirates unexpectedly made a run at the NL Central title despite having the majors' lowest payroll.
McClintock said viewership is up steeply in the coveted 18-to-49 and 25-to-54 age groups, which suggests the Pirates are attracting new viewers who may have tuned out during their record run of 19 consecutive losing seasons.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.