Early start for U.S. soccer at Olympics
TribLIVE Sports Videos
GLASGOW, Scotland — More than 400 miles from center stage, the coach of the U.S. women's soccer team leaned toward the microphone and gave her own musical opening to the Olympic Games.
“Have a little faith in me,” sang Pia Sundhage, channeling John Hiatt in perfect pitch — complete with a soulful flourish at the end.
The competitive portion of the London Games begins Wednesday, two days before the opening ceremony and far removed from the nonstop Olympic freneticism of the British capital. Soccer is one of two sports that starts early — archery is the other — because the extra days are needed to play a sufficient slate of games that doesn't wear out the players.
The Americans start group play against France at historic Hampden Park, the only Scottish venue for the Summer Games. One can barely walk 20 feet in London without noticing something that has to do with the Olympics, but the buzz in Glasgow just isn't the same. Some 37,000 fans are expected for the U.S.-France, Colombia-North Korea doubleheader in the 52,000-seat stadium, but organizers say about 80 percent of the tickets were freebies given to schools and local clubs because women's soccer isn't much of a draw in these parts.
Sundhage gave her news conference in a nearly empty auditorium — there were far more volunteers than journalists — and the players are staying in a regular downtown hotel instead of an Olympic village. The two-time defending champs will have to make the gold-medal game to be assured of playing in London, and they won't be attending Friday's opening ceremony because they have an afternoon game against Colombia in Glasgow the next day.
“It's too much on the body and the mind to fly back and forth. The focus is on the games and that's the most important thing,” captain Christie Rampone said. “I would love for this team to experience an opening ceremonies because you kind of get that feeling of what the actual games are all about, with all the other countries and meeting different athletes from your own country. At the same time, getting to start it off with that first match of the Olympics is something special as well. We'll celebrate it together, and watch the opening ceremonies.”
Starting early means a quicker end to the agonizing wait, which is a good thing for the Americans. They've been training in Glasgow for a week after spending the previous week in Darlington, England, and they've become a bit antsy.
“You can feel the tension start to rise,” goalkeeper Hope Solo said. “It's a good, positive energy, and people are going into tackles harder. It's like ‘unleash the beast.' We're waiting for somebody to unleash us.”
World Cup after giving the Americans a scare in the semifinals and is riding an remarkable 17-game winning streak. Even though the U.S. is considered the gold medal favorite, it's not inconceivable to see an early upset that throws the tournament wide open.
“It won't be that easy for the USA to win against us,” France coach Bruno Bini said. “It will be a really tough match.”
It's also a tough call to decide which coach is more entertaining. Both are seize-the-moment optimists who like to sing songs to their players — Bini even writes some of his own — and both are big on inspirational quotes. At his news conference, Bini managed to turn nearly every question into some sort of punch line.
Asked about having to play the tough Americans first, he said: “My dream was to play Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and San Marino, but unfortunately none of them qualified.”
As for Sundhage, she said her American squad is “healthy and happy,” as well as stronger and more diverse than in previous years with talent to spare. Her toughest decisions might come when it's time to send on the substitutes.
“We have game-winners on the bench,” Sundhage said. “And they will win the game for us.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.