Olympics notebook: Beach volleyball players cover up
When temperatures dropped into the 60s for the start of the first night session at Horse Guards Parade, the Olympic beach volleyball players said bye-bye to their bikinis.
Two-time defending gold medalists Kerri Walsh Jennings and Misty May-Treanor of the United States wore long-sleeved shirts on top of bikini bottoms for their 21-18, 21-19 victory over Natalie Cook and Tasmin Hinchley, a match that started at 11 p.m. Saturday when the temperature was 63 degrees. The Australians wore long pants, with T-shirts under their bikini tops.
“It's cold,” Walsh Jennings said, a “what do you expect?” look on her face.
Queen's back in place
Fresh from her star turn as the latest Bond Girl, Queen Elizabeth II returned to Olympic Park for an encore.
The queen visited with British Olympians in the athletes village and rode to the top of the 377-foot Orbit tower beside the stadium, where Friday she officially opened the Games.
In describing her role in the ceremony, created by director Danny Boyle, Johnson said the queen told him she was “very, very impressed with the success of her first film appearance, her first dramatic venture. It was very funny and seems to have gone down particularly well with the international audiences.”
Somber moment left out by American TV
Akram Khan, the choreographer of a somber segment in the London Olympics opening ceremony, said he's disappointed that NBC decided not to show it to an American audience.
Spectators were asked to display photos of loved ones who could not be there during the segment.
The music, a hymn called “Abide With Me,” was described in the ceremony's program as an “honest expression of the fear of approaching death.” NBC producers did not air it, instead showing Ryan Seacrest's interview with Michael Phelps.
The ceremony was seen in the U.S. by 40.7 million people, making it the most-watched opening ceremony for an Olympics.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.