General manager Huntington, Pirates mull call-up options for year
Pirates general manager Neal Huntington said Sunday that deciding which players to call up beginning in September is a different exercise this season than it was his first few years on the job.
“The decision who to call up has been: Who do we want to look at? Who do we want to reward? Is a guy ready to come up? Is he going to play?” Huntington said. “Now, it's who's going to help us win? Who gives us an extra weapon for (manager Clint Hurdle) to try to win a game late?”
Huntington also has to consider what he wants the club to look like on Oct. 5, when the wild-card playoff games begin.
“The makeup of our club at midnight on Aug. 31 is the makeup of our club on Oct. 5, provided we take care of business and we get there,” Huntington said. “So that's a little different, to try to put together an Oct. 5 roster on Aug. 31.”
Huntington confirmed that players on the 15-day disabled list, including outfielder Starling Marte and reliever Chad Qualls, would be eligible for the postseason roster. In the cases of pitcher Charlie Morton and infielder Gustavo Nunez, if they remain on the 60-day disabled list the remainder of the season, the Pirates can replace them with someone who is in the organization as of Aug. 31 but not necessarily on the 25-man roster.
Nunez, the Pirates' Rule 5 pick who has been out all season after having right ankle surgery, is on a rehab assignment with Double-A Altoona.
“As of right now,” Huntington said, “we're treating it as if we're going to have the one wild-card spot (Morton) where we can add someone off the roster, and that's where you look at who your first-round opponent is and who else from your system can help.”
Karen Price is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-320-7980 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.