Pirates notebook: Bucs look in-house to replace Bedard
By Rob Biertempfel
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2012, 10:26 a.m.
The Pirates do not need to immediately make an addition to their starting rotation in the wake of LHP Erik Bedard's release on Tuesday. Due to the off day Thursday, the four remaining starters can make their next scheduled turns on normal rest. There isn't a need to replace Bedard until the series next week against the Astros.
Manager Clint Hurdle said Kevin Correia (9-8, 4.53) could move from the bullpen back to the rotation. What about going outside the organization for someone such as Mark Buehrle or even Roger Clemens? “Our focus starts in-house,” Hurdle said, mentioning prospects lefty Jeff Locke and righty Kyle McPherson.
Hurdle said the decision to cut Bedard was “strictly performance-related.” Bedard, 33, had a 5.01 ERA and leads the NL with 15 losses. “We tried various methods to get Erik in a most consistent place,” Hurdle said. “We weren't able to do it.” Bedard signed a one-year, $4.5 million free-agent contract in the offseason.
• Second baseman Neil Walker (tightness in lower back) was examined by doctors Tuesday. With Walker down at least another day or two, infielder Chase d'Arnaud was recalled from Triple-A Indianapolis. In 97 games with Indy, d'Arnaud hit .247 with 37 RBI and 33 stolen bases. “I'll come off the bench here, steal a base and score a run,” d'Arnaud said. “Whatever they need me to do.”
• Reliever Chad Qualls (toe), eligible to come off the DL on Sept. 9, threw off flat ground Tuesday.
• Right-hander Jeff Karstens (groin) threw his scheduled side session Tuesday.
• Indianapolis closer Tim Wood and outfielder Starling Marte (now with the Pirates) were named to the Triple-A Internationa League postseason all-star team.
— Rob Biertempfel
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.