Pirates' late-season tailspin persists
Pirates manager Clint Hurdle said he has long had a question for lowly teams far removed from postseason consideration that somehow manage to spoil the chances of those who are still in it: Why now?
“That's really what it comes down to sometimes,” Hurdle said before the Pirates played the Houston Astros, who own the worst record in Major League Baseball by a substantial margin, a team that came into PNC Park on Monday having lost an astounding 50 of its last 59 games. “Why now do you feel like you should beat somebody you shouldn't beat?”
It was also a relevant question after the game, after a 5-1 Astros' victory witnessed by a grouchy crowd of 20,005. For the Pirates, the loss happened at a particularly bad time. After dropping three straight in Milwaukee, the club was expecting to return home and heal against a lesser opponent and perhaps start a stretch of consistent play worthy of a playoff contender.
This was hardly a fatal blow to the Pirates, who began the day just 1½ games out of the second wild-card spot and have most of September to make some noise. Still, it was an ugly, dispiriting loss to the worst team in the game and to a pitcher who had not won in more than four years.
His name is Edgar Gonzalez, and if it fails to ring a bell it did not resonate much with the Pirates, either. The 29-year-old right-hander last won April 24, 2008, while pitching for Arizona. In a career that spanned three prior clubs in eight big league seasons, Gonzalez was 14-25 with a 5.90 ERA.
But Hurdle was again prescient, labeling Gonzalez a “hungry” pitcher who was thrilled to be back in the majors and wants to stay. After Gonzalez worked 5 1⁄3 innings, limiting to the Pirates to five hits — three by Garrett Jones — and one run while striking out five and walking one, Hurdle repeated his assessment, but he added that the Pirates helped.
“He wasn't in too much trouble, so he didn't have to try to create anything out there,” Hurdle said. “He mixed his pitches. Threw the slider, threw the changeup on occasion, spotted the fastball. We were not able to connect any at-bats together.”
“He was mixing his pitches, up and down, using all of his pitches,” said center fielder Andrew McCutchen, who went 0 for 4. “For him to have a good game, that's what he has to do. Be able to locate ‘em, and that's what he did.”
Trailing 5-1 in the sixth, the Pirates had a chance to come back after Jones' single put runners on first and second with one out. Mickey Storey relieved. He struck out Gaby Sanchez on three pitches and got Pedro Alvarez to ground out.
In his first start of the season, Pirates left-hander Jeff Locke, who struck out six in five innings, escaped a bases-loaded jam with minimal damage in the first and kept his team close until Brent Wallace belted a three-run homer to make it 5-0 in the fifth.
“A hanging curveball to Wallace,” Locke said. “He'd hit two fastballs for singles, and I had to do something a little different. But that one pitch is the only thing that really stands out to me. Everything else felt pretty good.”
Bob Cohn is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org or 412-320-7810.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.