Brock Holt's .432 batting average at Triple-A caught the attention of the Pirates' front office, but it was Neil Walker's back injury that led to his call-up. If Walker had made a quick recovery, Holt probably would have gone back to Indy, where he'd be guaranteed lots of playing time.
But Walker has been out longer than expected. And Holt has played perhaps better than expected. So now what?
Walker might be back in action Monday, when the Pirates begin a three-game set against the Reds. By then, Indy might be knocked out of its first-round playoff series. But even if Indy advances, Holt could remain with the Pirates after Walker returns to the lineup.
Holt has shown he can be a catalyst at the top of the lineup, an ingredient the Pirates have searched for all season. The Pirates can keep Holt's bat in play by giving him some starts at shortstop in place of Clint Barmes.
Holt is a natural second baseman, but he played shortstop in nine of his 24 games with Indy. At Double-A Altoona this year, he was used almost exclusively as a shortstop.
“I feel comfortable there,” Holt said. “There are differences — distances of throws, the reads and angles, turns and feeds — but I feel pretty good at both.”
But don't expect Holt to outright replace Barmes.
“It is unrealistic to expect Brock or any of our other shortstops to match Barmes' defense,” general manager Neal Huntington said. “Barmes has rebounded with the bat and has been essentially what we projected him to be overall — an outstanding defensive shortstop that stabilizes our infield defense while providing adequate offense.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.