Pitt's Donald may sit Saturday with knee injury
Defensive tackle Aaron Donald, the anchor of Pitt's line, may not play Saturday against Gardner-Webb because of a knee injury.
“Don't feel great about it,” coach Paul Chryst said, “but not totally ruled out.” Chryst said the injury is not expected to lead to a long-term absence for Donald, who was a second-team All-Big East selection last season.
“You do feel encouraged (for the future),” Chryst said. “It's not anything that has a long-term effect. It's just one of those things. I don't know if he will be able to go this Saturday, but certainly we feel really good about after that.” Donald has recorded eight tackles this season, two for a loss, and five quarterback hurries.
In other Pitt injury news, tight end Hubie Graham, who did not play last week against Virginia Tech because of a clavicle injury, is questionable. “He has done very little (in practice),” Chryst said.
Backup defensive end Jack Lippert also has been dealing with an undisclosed injury that probably will keep him out of the Gardner-Webb game.
The good news is that linebacker Todd Thomas, a 2011 starter who had knee surgery in January, might get his first snaps of the season Saturday.
“I don't want to say it's like sending a pitcher down to Triple-A to throw, but you have to get some live work,” Chryst said. “We have to see where Todd is at.”
Thomas has been practicing for the past week and has been encouraged by his progress.
“(He) felt better after each day,” Chryst said. “Todd was able to do a lot more (Wednesday) than he did a week ago, and Tuesday he did a fair amount.”
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-320-7997.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.