Late letdowns on defense hurting Steelers
By Alan Robinson
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012, 11:20 p.m.
They can blame the absence of all-world safety Troy Polamalu for two games. They can blame not getting the reliable push from their defensive line that would have helped prevent wide receivers from constantly gaining downfield separation.
To safety Ryan Clark, it's time to stop finding reasons why the Steelers secondary's statistics look great but their execution can look awful, especially in the second half.
To illustrate how numbers can lie, the Steelers (1-2) are No. 5 in total defense and No. 3 in passing yardage, yet they made an aging Peyton Manning look like an in-his-prime Manning, and Carson Palmer look like the Palmer of 2004. If Mark Sanchez hadn't looked like Mark Sanchez, the Steelers' numbers wouldn't look like they do.
Big plays allowed, drives extended, upsets not prevented, games lost in the second half. No matter what the statistics say, that's not the Steelers' way.
“It's like I said, on the first play (Sunday) there's no more excuses,” Clark said Wednesday. “We can't run in here and say, ‘We don't have Troy, we don't have James (Harrison).' We have everybody we're supposed to have now, so we've got to go out and make plays. You get a lift when those guys are out there, running to the ball and doing what they've done for years.”
What's contradictory to their high rankings is that opponents are converting nearly half of their third-down attempts (16 of 33), thus keeping an aging defense on the field too long. That's showing up in the second half, when the Steelers are giving up nearly twice as many yards passing (385) as they are in the first half (215).
“It hasn't been terrible; honestly, it hasn't been,” Clark said of the secondary's play. “I think the spot we come up on the wrong end of the grade is third down. If you look at anything we need to improve on, it's getting off the field in those clutch downs and getting the offense the ball back. People haven't really beaten us over the top.”
Palmer, for example, was 6 of 10 for 37 yards, one touchdown and one interception in the first half; in the second half, he was 18 of 24 for 172 yards and two touchdowns as the Raiders rallied from a 10-point deficit to win, 34-31.
“Any defense, if you're not going 100 percent on third down, you're not satisfied,” defensive end Cam Heyward said. “We have to pick it up. I think we're going to come out with a better effort this week.”
They might need one against ultra-mobile quarterback Michael Vick, whose ability to extend drives with his running and throwing helped the Eagles (3-1) rally in the fourth quarter of all three of their wins. Philadelphia visits Heinz Field on Sunday.
“He's taken a pounding this year, guys are getting to him, making him fumble and give the ball up,” Clark said, referring to Vick's five fumbles. “Even though he takes a lot of hits and he's a tough guy, you can get the ball out from him. You've got to continue to pound on him so it adds up as the game goes along.”
Last week, defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau suggested the defense's problems resulted in part from players abandoning their responsibilities and trying to make a play on their own. Trust each other and do your job.
That message was reinforced as the Steelers returned to practice Wednesday, when the defense was healthy and operating at full strength for the first time since training camp started.
“If we get no push or if we get push, we have to be solid on our coverage,” cornerback Cortez Allen said. “We've got to plaster their receivers, and that's going to be a big thing against Michael Vick, who does a good job as far as extending plays. Regardless of what happens up front, we have to be solid in our coverage.”
And not just on the stats sheet.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.