Mike Wallace has put together some impressive numbers during his career. But his career-high four drops against the Bengals nearly got into his head.
Wallace is convinced he remedied the situation in preparing to face the Washington Redskins on Sunday at Heinz Field.
“I'm upset it happened, but you can't dwell on it too much because it'll roll over to the next game,” Wallace said. “I'm good about it now because I caught everything in practice this week to get it off my back.”
Wallace has gone back to the basics. He spent the week polishing his routes and using his eyes to the watch the ball in before tucking it away. He challenged cornerbacks Ike Taylor and Keenan Lewis to help sharpen his focus.
Still, he's perplexed about his uninspired performance against the Bengals.
“I don't know what happened,” he said. “It was kind of a snowball effect. I took my eyes off the first one, and I had hard time shaking it off.”
Steelers safety Ryan Clark will hardly recognize the Redskins: Only two players — tight end Chris Cooley and receiver Santana Moss — remain on the Washington roster since he left after the 2005 season.
“They were the only two. It's been a long time,” Clark said. “It would be cool to see those guys. It's not the same team though as when I left. This is the Steelers versus the new Redskins. It's going to be a challenge.”
The Steelers won, 23-6, in the teams' last meeting in 2008. Clark sat out that game with an injured shoulder. He'll get his chance to face down Moss, a deep threat for rookie quarterback Robert Griffin III.
“When I was there, (Moss) was the guy,” Clark said. “He was our No. 1 option. He was in the prime of his career.”
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.