ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Peyton sheds light on Steelers' defense to brother Eli

| Sunday, Nov. 4, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

For Giants quarterback Eli Manning, insight on the Steelers defense was a phone call away.

Big brother Peyton Manning of the Broncos beat the Steelers in Week 1.

“I talked to him a little bit,” Eli Manning said. “We talked a little football. I asked if they had anything and he said what they do is what they always do and they have good players and a good scheme. He didn't have anything earth-shattering to tell me that I wouldn't see from previous games that we played against them over the years or just watching the film from this year.”

The Steelers' lineup has changed from when Peyton Manning saw it. Safety Troy Polamalu is out with a calf injury, and linebacker James Harrison is back after missing the Broncos game following knee surgery.

Mannings vs. Steelers

The Mannings have been fairly successful against the Steelers during their careers. Peyton is 3-1 during the regular season with 1,042 yards passing, eight touchdowns and four interceptions. Eli is 1-1 with 381 yards, three touchdowns and one interception. Peyton Manning lost the biggest game by a Manning brother against Pittsburgh — the 2005 season playoff game when the Colts were Super Bowl favorites.

No respect

Eli Manning and Ben Roethlisberger have won four Super Bowls between them, yet Steelers cornerback Ike Taylor is surprised when he hears Aaron Rodgers or Drew Brees referred to as the best quarterback this side of Tom Brady.

“Eli's been doing this for a long time, and other than our quarterback, I feel like Eli is the most underrated quarterback in the league,” Taylor said. “I don't know why he doesn't get the recognition. Both of them have Super Bowls, and that tells you right there.”

Alan Robinson and Mark Kaboly are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Robinson can be reached at can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.