Adams, Crosby may skip labor meeting
By Rob Rossi
Published: Monday, Nov. 5, 2012, 6:53 p.m.
Sidney Crosby is returning to Consol Energy Center on Tuesday, but only to see Madonna.
The NHL lockout hits Day 52 on Tuesday, though a group negotiation meeting between the league and its Players' Association is scheduled for somewhere in New York City.
A series of meetings Saturday between deputy commissioner Bill Daly and union special counsel Steve Fehr sparked this session.
“Both sides feel it's important to step it up and meet in larger groups — so that's a good sign,” Penguins union rep Craig Adams said Monday after a players-organized practice at Southpointe.
“Clearly, there's a feeling there is some traction there ... and it's worth pursuing.”
Fehr agreed Sunday with Daly's assessment that their meeting included “frank discussion on the most important issues separating us.” Adams, on Monday, said those issues as revenue division, salary-cap calculation and escrow.
“But there are a lot of other big issues, too — in the player contracting department,” he said.
Adams said he was “looking into flights to New York,” but had not committed to attending the Tuesday meeting. Penguins teammates at Southpointe on Monday — Crosby, Matt Cooke, Pascal Dupuis and Chris Kunitz — said their plan was to practice again Tuesday and not attend the New York meeting.
Crosby, who along with Adams attended the last group negotiating session between the NHL and NHLPA in Toronto on Oct. 18, said he was unsure “who's invited.”
Thus, he invited teammates and their significant others to join him in a private suite at Consol Energy Center for the Madonna concert.
“You don't want to read into anything,” Crosby said of the Tuesday meeting.
The NHLPA held a negotiation committee conference call at 4 p.m. Monday, though players downplayed its significance.
“There are updates when updates need to happen,” Cooke said. “That's all the call is about.”
Cooke returned to practice after leaving a workout Friday because of a facial wound. He said players did not pay attention to weekend speculation within the media that the NHL would propose an offer to split revenue evenly and immediately guarantee current contracts.
The NHL has not divulged details on any alterations to the “make whole” portion of its last offer, made Oct. 16. The union viewed that offer, which called for an immediate 50/50 split of revenue, as unacceptable because players believed down-the-road payments of current guaranteed contracts would ultimately count against potential future earnings.
The meeting Tuesday would not produce a labor agreement, Adams said.
“I don't think we're at that point where 24 hours will be enough,” he said.
Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com or 412-380-5635.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.