Criminal charges filed against two Pitt athletes
Two Pitt athletes are no longer with their teams because they were involved in separate criminal incidents.
Trey Zeigler, a junior guard who transferred this year from Central Michigan, was charged with drunken driving early Sunday and indefinitely suspended by basketball coach Jamie Dixon. Football coach Paul Chryst dismissed Steve Williams because police charged him with assaulting his girlfriend Saturday.
Pittsburgh police said they found Zeigler, 21, passed out behind the wheel of his Hummer at the intersection of Craft Avenue and Boulevard of the Allies in Oakland shortly after 3 a.m. Sunday, according to a criminal complaint.
Police will mail a summons for two misdemeanor driving under the influence charges to Zeigler, who must appear in Pittsburgh Municipal Court for a preliminary hearing Feb. 5.
“The incident involving Trey Zeigler is not only surprising, but incredibly disappointing,” Dixon said Monday in a statement. “Although I believe it was out of character for Trey, he has been immediately suspended until further notice. Trey has expressed his deep regret to me and understands and respects the importance of accountability for one's actions.”
Police said Zeigler failed field sobriety tests. He was handcuffed after a breath test showed his blood-alcohol content was 0.129 percent, above than the state's legal 0.08 percent limit for drivers.
Williams, 19, was arrested because Samantha Boggess, who identified herself as his girlfriend, said he assaulted her in his apartment on South Bouquet Street in Oakland at 1:50 a.m. Saturday.
Williams, a redshirt freshman defensive back from Savannah, Ga., faces a preliminary hearing at 8 a.m. Wednesday in Pittsburgh Municipal Court.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.