ShareThis Page

Waltrip driving for Sandy Hook victims

| Sunday, Feb. 24, 2013, 12:01 a.m.


Michael Waltrip, a two-time winner of the Daytona 500, will make a resounding statement Sunday when he pulls his car onto the storied racetrack at Daytona International Speedway.

Waltrip proudly honored the 26 Sandy Hook shooting victims by putting that number on his Toyota Camry. The Sandy Hook School Support Fund-sponsored Swan Racing car will start 29th after earning its way into the 43-car field during Thursday's qualifying duel races.

“We needed to make it for the folks in Newtown, Connecticut,” said Waltrip, owner of Michael Waltrip Racing. “We wanted to have something for them to smile about on Sunday, and now they do.”

Waltrip and Swan Racing donated $50,000 to the fund in an effort to raise awareness to gun violence like the mass shootings in Newtown, Conn. It was an unfathomable tragedy that stunned the country and challenged Congress to engage in the political wrangling required to pass meaningful gun law legislation.

Waltrip, who often speaks with a defiant voice, has declined to say where he stands on the controversial gun issue. When pressed for an answer as he walked to the garage, he said nothing.

At some point, Waltrip has to deal with the inescapable reality that his NASCAR brethren are closely aligned to the factions — NRA and Republicans — that doggedly oppose gun control reform while the majority of the country are demanding background checks, closing the gun show loop hole and a ban on assault weapons.

Realistically, this is a bridge too far, even for a maverick such as Waltrip. He can passionately support the families of Sandy Hook, but he appears hesitant to take on NASCAR's brass, many of whom made significant contributions to Congressional Republicans — including Rep. Vernon Buchanan (R-Fla.) and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.) — who aren't likely to concede or compromise their positions to protect Second Amendment rights of their constituents.

Yet, of the 75 million NASCAR fans, more than 70 percent support some form of gun reform. And 92 percent of Americans support implementing background checks.

While Waltrip might be tight-lipped about where he stands on this issue, race fans will be reminded of the consequences of guns in the wrong hands as the No. 26 Toyota contends for NASCAR's most prestigious prize.

“It's always something,” Waltrip said. “It seems like every time I was carrying a lot of hopes and dreams for people that I wanted to cheer up on my car. The folks at Swan Racing said we're going to come in and race, and figure this out.”

Swan Racing threw all its weight behind the Sandy Hook project. David Stremme went to auctions to find the right car. He bought parts from Waltrip's team and Roush-Fenway Racing to piece together a ride to show the organization's support for the families of the Sandy Hook victims.

“No one is working any harder, cares more, wants to be part of this deal more than David,” Waltrip said. “It's a big deal for the team, for the sponsor and the (Newtown) community.”

It'll be an even bigger deal if one of NASCAR's own uses his money and political clout to influence Republicans and Democrats alike to deal seriously and expeditiously with passing gun control reform that could prevent another Sandy Hook massacre.

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or viaTwitter @RalphPaulk_Trib. Listen to the Auto Racing Show with Ralph N. Paulk every Friday on TribLive Radio at 9 to 10 a.m.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.