Fox Chapel's Ganassi has rough start to Daytona 500
DAYTONA BEACH, Fla. — Fox Chapel native Chip Ganassi will not win his second Daytona 500 in four years after both of his drivers — Juan Pablo Montoya and Jamie McMurray — were involved in an accident on Lap 33 that took over several favorites.
Montoya's No.42 Target Chevrolet was gathered up by Kasey Kahne, who lost control of his car when tagged from behind by Kyle Busch. McMurray, the 2010 champion here, appeared to escape the accident but his No.1 Chevrolet was hit by two cars spinning down toward the infield.
McMurray and Montoya have since returned to the racetrack. McMurray was 38 laps down and Montoya 52, as the race neared the halfway mark of the 200-lap race.
"Somebody backed-up to my grill. It was just a little touch. I saw them when they were all getting together, and I said ‘Oh, they are wrecking.' And as soon as I said they were wrecking the No. 5 (Kasey Kahne) went left into me. I managed to brake, and just touched him a little bit with nose. Then somebody else wrecked a lot harder behind him, and came on my side and killed the car on the side.
"So, we are fixing it. We're going to run out there and try to score some decent points. You could see it coming. They were all checking up. And I thought ‘Somebody isn't going to check-up and screw-up'. And, then, they did."
So far, defending champion Matt Kenseth and three-time 500 winner Jeff Gordon have led the most laps. Pole-sitter Danica Patrick has been running in the top 5 for much of the race, and regained the lead on the Lap 90 restart to become the first woman ever to lead a lap at the Daytona 500.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.