ShareThis Page

Daytona a reminder of sport's dangers

| Sunday, March 3, 2013, 12:16 a.m.

I figured my eyes had deceived me as Kyle Larson crawled out of a car that had been sliced after it left the racetrack and slammed into the catch fence at Daytona International Speedway.

Incredibly, Larson escaped with only a few scratches. He didn't even limp to the infield care center while his broken Chevrolet dangled on a hook, headed to a scrap yard as its next destination.

For a while, it looked as if Larson was trying to appreciate the miracle of a spared life. Instead, he glanced into the grandstands to catch a glimpse of the carnage that spilled into a crowd dodging debris scattered about like shrapnel.

Fortunately, all 28 spectators injured in last Saturday's season-opening Nationwide Series race survived.

From a mental standpoint, it's a different story for Larson. The emotional wounds are deep, and probably won't start to heel until he climbs back into the cockpit. He will have to deal with the demons of speed that lurk in every corner, every crowded front stretch.

Larson was back behind the wheel in the Nationwide race at Phoenix International Raceway on Saturday. He had no choice, really. He has to get over it, in part, because a seemingly bright future will be stalled if one horrific crash dampens his enthusiasm.

In essence, the same can be said about NASCAR fans. As Tony Stewart said after collecting the checkered flag, racing is a dangerous sport — an inherent reality for drivers who challenge the limits of their powerful machines.

We were reminded of such when Dale Earnhardt died 12 years ago in Daytona. We were shaken by that reality when Dan Wheldon — the then-reigning Indianapolis champion — died in a violent crash when his car catapulted into the catch fence at Las Vegas in 2011.

It was a sobering reminder, too, when three spectators were killed in 1999 after a tire sailed over the catch fence during an IndyCar race at Charlotte Motor Speedway.

Already, the lawyers have lined up. They hope to hold DIS president Joie Chitwood and NASCAR accountable for the injuries sustained by spectators.

It's too early to know how those legal efforts will turn out.

However, there's one hard truth about this near-tragic incident. The spectators, like drivers, agree to accept the sometimes-inevitable dangers of a sport in which death, destruction and mayhem are always lurking in the shadows.

The challenge facing every attorney is convincing a jury that the waiver on the back of every ticket won't survive under intense legal scrutiny.

That waiver reads: “The Holder of this ticket expressly assumes all risk incidents to the event. … and agrees that all participants, sanctioning bodies, and all employees, agents, officers, and directors of Daytona International Speedway, its affiliates and subsidiaries are hearby released from any and all claims arising from the event, including claims of negligence.”

Much will be riding on two key elements in the legal debate: whether the waiver releases NASCAR of any liability, and if the catch fence was constructed properly.

Predictably, Chitwood insisted the catch fence did its job. However, the liability question could yield a less predictable outcome. Either way, the terrifying last-lap crash should motivate NASCAR to reassess its commitment to create a safe environment for both drivers and fans.

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib. Listen to the Auto Racing Show with Ralph N. Paulk every Friday on TribLive Radio at 9 to 10 a.m.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.