ShareThis Page

Paulk: Logano drives Hamlin batty

| Saturday, March 30, 2013, 11:52 p.m.

At some point during his career, Denny Hamlin will capture a Sprint Cup championship. Perhaps, he'll win two or three titles.

Besides, he has the requisite skills and instincts of most contenders. Also, former NFL coach Joe Gibbs continues to provide Hamlin with a car and crew even more reliable than the mammoth offensive lines that helped propel the Washington Redskins to three Super Bowl victories.

However, Hamlin's success hinges on him keeping his head together under pressure. He has managed his emotions admirably over the past several years. He avoided being lured into mindless, distraction-filled confrontations.

Then, along came Joey Logano.

Logano, a former Gibbs Racing teammate, has succeeded in driving Hamlin mad. The usually even-tempered Hamlin has lost his focus. With every passing weekend, a lug nut seemingly loosens to weaken him mentally, thus impairing Hamlin's vision of a championship.

Last Sunday, Hamlin's title aspirations were dashed when the two collided on the final lap at Fontana. It's an accident that left Hamlin with a fractured vertebra. Mark Martin will pilot the No. 11 Toyota at Martinsville next weekend, and Hamlin isn't expected back until the May 11 race at Darlington.

Logano attempted to smooth things over with a text message to Hamlin earlier this week. But Hamlin acknowledged the “unproductive” text exchange didn't resolve anything.

The two are in a similar place to when their feud began to simmer during the latter stages of the 2012 Cup season. They were never the best of teammates, and it was clear Gibbs was putting Logano on the waiver wire in an effort to maintain some semblance of camaraderie.

Of course, Logano's dismissal was assured as soon as word leaked that Matt Kenseth was considering jumping from Roush-Fenway Racing to JGR. It's not as if Kenseth and Hamlin are a perfect fit, but Kenseth is a mature driver willing to work with Hamlin if it'll position both to win JGR's fourth Sprint Cup title.

Logano still is feeling the sting of rejection. He was given three years to deliver at JGR, but he left with a bruised ego and with the need to prove he's better, smarter and tougher than Hamlin.

Instead, Logano exposed every weakness that prompted Gibbs to show him the door. He doesn't have the patience and maturity to navigate the choppy waters that always have steered him off course despite Gibbs providing him with the equipment and personnel to succeed.

However, while Logano's juvenile antics are largely responsible for the two exchanging verbal jabs and paint schemes the past two weekends, the burden is on Hamlin to brush aside the petty squabbling to ensure he qualifies for the Chase.

I agreed with Hamlin's criticism of comparing the new Gen-6 car to the oft-maligned Car of Tomorrow. I part with him, though, when he opts to engage in a senseless battle with a driver nowhere near his equal.

Hamlin, who has 22 Cup victories in eight seasons, should know better. He should know that every point counts when the 12 Chase qualifiers push the reset button for the postseason and that Logano won't be in championship contention.

Hamlin and Logano might be giving NASCAR chairman and CEO Brian France what he wants — the WWE on wheels. But the two of them “having at it” as France encouraged three years ago won't benefit either with a points format designed to reward consistency instead of wins.

The fact that Hamlin is 10th in points after tumbling four spots at Fontana is a testament to his talents. However, it also reflects a need for him to tighten the mental lug nuts and keep alive his championship aspirations.

Ralph N. Paulk is a Trib Total Media reporter. Reach him at or via Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib. Listen to the Auto Racing Show with Ralph N. Paulk every Friday at 9 to 10 a.m. on TribLive Radio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.