ShareThis Page

Paulk: Earnhardt driving back to the front in NASCAR

| Sunday, April 7, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Let's face it: No Sprint Cup driver is under the microscope as much as Dale Earnhardt Jr.

Earnhardt is expected to win. And he should.

There was a stretch during his tenure with Dale Earnhardt Inc. in which his bewildered team couldn't keep up. As a result, he was haunted by blown engines, flawed fuel strategies, worn tires and bad luck.

Still, Earnhardt shouldered much of the blame. He often pointed an accusing finger at himself as he endured two lengthy victory droughts over the past seven seasons — including four winless seasons.

The expectations were loftier when Earnhardt left DEI for Hendrick Motorsports in 2008. Even with five-time Cup champion Jimmie Johnson and four-time champion Jeff Gordon as teammates, Earnhardt has commanded the spotlight.

For the most part, the sports' perennially most popular driver has come up short.

All his charm and charisma can't overshadow the fact that he has largely underachieved with a team rich in resources. He has won only twice in 183 starts while driving the 88 Chevrolet for Hendrick Motorsports.

Finally, it seems as if Earnhardt is about to turn the corner. Already, he has three top-five finishes in five starts to put him atop the points standings for only the third time during the past five seasons.

Remarkably, hardly anyone has noticed.

Earnhardt's early-season performance has been overshadowed by teammates Kasey Kahne and Johnson. Johnson won the Daytona 500, and Kahne captured the checkered flag at Auto Club Speedway two weeks ago.

Also, the ongoing feud between Denny Hamlin and Tony Logano drew most everyone's attention the past three weeks.

Earnhardt quietly crept up the leader board while the focus remained mostly on Danica Patrick and an evolving Gen-6 car.

Earnhardt, though, doesn't seem to mind.

“I feel like it gives us the opportunity to keep focusing on what we need to do,” Earnhardt said earlier this week. “We're still not winning races, and I don't expect to get much attention until we can win races.

“I guess the way we've run doesn't really reflect well on our finishes. We've finished well but there are a lot of areas we can improve, and we get to focus on that sort of being out of the scope and out of the spotlight. We can pay more attention to how do we get better as a team.

“If we go out and win some races, we'll get credit where credit is due,” he added. “We've gotten lucky, we've had good cars.

However, no one else in the Sprint Cup garage faces the same pressures that have dogged Earnhardt since he made his Cup debut in 1999.

“I wouldn't expect the spotlight to be much brighter than it is,” Earnhardt said. “Hopefully we can win some races, though, and change that.”

Earnhardt is looking to change things at Martinsville Speedway on Sunday. While he has often struggled at Martinsville, this short track seemingly fits into his wheelhouse.

“I remember the first several races I ran there, I ran into everything,” he recalled. “I ran into other race cars, walls, pace cars, just about everything.

“It was real frustrating because I had thought of myself as a short-track driver, and I thought that I had honed these skills on these short tracks in the Southeast, and this should be where I excel the most. Short-track racing can really allow you to get carried away with yourself.”

At times, Earnhardt could have been accused of getting wrapped up into the hype and the expectations. Now, it seems he has morphed into a mature, patient driver who understands what is required to win a Cup championship.

Eventually, he will. And he should.

Ralph N. Paulk is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or Twitter @RalphPaulk_Trib. Listen to the Auto Racing Show with Ralph N. Paulk every Friday at 9 to 10 a.m. on TribLive Radio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.