Four Pitt freshmen played against Buffalo, immediately burning their redshirt season.
They were outside linebacker Ejuan Price, running back Corey Davis, wide receiver/punt returner Ronald Jones and nose tackle K.K. Mosley-Smith. Only Jones made an impact, returning four punts for 52 yards.
Freshmen Lafayette Pitts, LaQuentin Smith and Nicholas Grigsby did not play, but they may get on the field later in the season. Grigsby and Smith could help at inside linebacker.
"You don't want someone on the field until you know they are comfortable in their own skin," defensive coordinator Keith Patterson said. "You have to be able to know when that time is."
Pitts moved from cornerback to safety late in camp, and coaches want to give him more time to learn the position.
» Coach Todd Graham said he wants to see more speed at inside linebacker.
"We want to be faster, play faster," he said, explaining that senior inside linebackers Max Gruder and Tristan Roberts are adjusting to a new way to read keys. "They were trained to key a different way than how we play, and that's really hard. It's really hard for guys who have been playing the same way, trying to break them of that."
There is a chance Price, who played 30 snaps Saturday, could move inside.
"We want him to play a lot more than 30 snaps," Graham said.
» Todd Graham likes Ray Graham's desire to remain on the field, but he said he needs to recognize when he's tired.
"The only thing he has to do, when he is tired, he needs to come out," he said. "Sometimes, he waves (the substitute) off and he needs to quit doing that because he's tired and he could put the ball in jeopardy."
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.