Pitt lands more football recruits
By Pittsburgh The Tribune-Review
Published: Monday, Jan. 31, 2011
The Pitt football program received four -- possibly five -- more verbal commitments over the weekend when Steve Williams, a safety from Savannah (Ga.) Calvary Day School, receiver Ronald Jones of Fort Meade, Fla., and cornerback Lloyd Carrington of Dallas' Lincoln High School said they plan to enroll.
They were followed by a commitment Sunday from outside linebacker LaQuentin Smith of Dr. Phillips High School in Orlando, Fla.
Williams and Jones told the Tribune-Review on Sunday that they intended to sign a letter of intent with the Panthers on Wednesday.
Williams, 6 feet 2, 197 pounds, played mostly offense last season, rushing for 1,691 yards and 22 touchdowns, but he will not initially play running back at Pitt, he said.
Jones, 5 feet 8, 165 pounds, is the eighth running back, receiver or tight end among Pitt coach Todd Graham's 14-player Class of 2011.
Carrington, 6 feet, 180 pounds, visited Pitt on Saturday and yesterday after a stop in Minnesota. He also had been considering Houston among his 17 offers. Other schools in the mix were Baylor, Oklahoma State, North Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, New Mexico State, Louisiana Tech and Tulsa. He had not previously committed to a school before visiting Pitt.
"Pitt is a very unique place with good facilities and a good fan base," Carrington said before boarding a plane back to Dallas. "And I believe in coach Graham."
Smith is 6 feet 1, 205 pounds and said he had offers from "every Big East school," plus South Carolina, Arkansas and Illinois.
"My heart was telling me (Pitt) is the best fit for me," he said.
Smith said his teammate at Dr. Phillips High School, safety Roderick Ryles, also plans to commit to Pitt. Ryles is 6 feet 1, 185 pounds.
Smith and Ryles are three-star recruits, according to rivals.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.