Seton Hill's Bujdos wins WVIAC cross country title
Seton Hill sophomore Jeannie Bujdos is the West Virginia Intercollegiate Athletic Conference Runner of the Year after winning the individual race at the WVIAC championships Saturday on the Griffins' home course.
Bujdos completed the 6K race in 22 minutes, 5.32 seconds to earn first-team all-conference honors.
Wheeling Jesuit edged Seton Hill for the team championship, 40-42.
Joining Bujdos from Seton Hill as first-team all-conference placewinners were Mary Janak, who was sixth in 23:25.77, and Leah Schott, who was eighth in 23:44.92. Seton Hill's second-team all-conference placewinners included Meagan Carter, who was 12th in 24:05.68; Megan Cala, 15th, 24:24.62; Emily Dempsey, 17th, 24:26.80; and Brianna Presutti, 19th, 24:36.08.
In the men's race, Seton Hill placed third in the 11-team field behind Wheeling Jesuit and West Virginia Wesleyan.
Seton Hill's Jon Bogert was the Griffins' top individual performer, placing fourth in 28:06.56 to earn first-team all-conference honors, along with teammate Justin Weaver, who was fifth in 28:17.89.
Robby Peters of Concord won the individual title in 27:31.86.
Seton Hill, which will change its conference affiliation to the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference next season, will round out its final year in the WVIAC with a trip to the NCAA Division II Atlantic Region championships on Nov. 3 at Lock Haven.
Golf: Seton Hill claims 3rd
The Seton Hill women's golf team settled for a third-place finish among nine teams at the WVIAC championships Saturday in Davis, W.Va.
The Griffins shot a two-day total of 658, finishing behind Wheeling Jesuit (636) and Concord (646).
Morgan Miller of Seton Hill came away tied for third with Fairmont State's Elizabeth Frederick at 155. Wheeling Jesuit freshman Kasey Frazier won the individual title with a 150.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.