Share This Page

Duquesne men's basketball team loses to Georgetown

| Sunday, Nov. 11, 2012, 8:44 p.m.
Duquesne's Jeremiah Jones shoots against Georgetown's Markel Starks on Sunday, Nov. 11, 2012, in Washington. AP Photo/Richard Lipski

WASHINGTON — After the Duquesne men's basketball team lost a 61-55 game at Georgetown on Sunday, dropping the Dukes to 0-2 for the first time in six years, Duquesne freshman point guard Derrick Colter was asked about his first college game.

“Versus Albany?” a confused Colter asked.

No, but the Dukes certainly look like they don't have much experience behind them.

Because they don't.

First-year coach Jim Ferry's young team challenged Georgetown, but Duquesne had more downs (ceding an 8-0 run midway through the second half) than ups (a late 10-2 run that cut the deficit to 56-53 with 31 seconds left). Take Colter, who had seven points and five assists but also five turnovers.

“It's like that in practice, too,” Ferry said. “He has a good minute and a bad minute, and that's a freshman. Fast forward this, and we're going to see what Derrick Colter is going to be in four years. I think he's going to be a pretty good basketball player.”

Colter, who grew up in nearby Forestville, Md., had the added pressure Sunday of playing in what he called “sweet home.”

“You're starting a freshman in the second game of his career, a local kid playing against Georgetown — how about that night?” Ferry said of Colter, whose high school coach sat behind the Duquesne bench.

Ferry was also impressed with the play of Sean Johnson, who led the Dukes with 21 points and eight rebounds.

“I really challenged Sean after our trip up to Albany,” Ferry said. “I didn't think Sean played very well. I thought our freshmen played better than our upperclassmen.”

Jerry Jones added 10 points and eight rebounds, and the Detroit native made a 3-pointer with 31 seconds left to bring the Dukes within three points.

Still, Duquesne shot just 35.6 percent and had 16 turnovers.

“It's hard,” Ferry said. “It's a total adjustment, because everything's different.”

Dan Feldman is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.