Duquesne targets Long Island's Ferry as men's basketball coach
By Jerry DiPaola
Published: Monday, April 9, 2012, 7:58 p.m.
While the 17-day coaching search winds down, Duquesne has targeted Long Island Brooklyn's Jim Ferry as a candidate to replace Ron Everhart as its next basketball coach, a university source said.
Ferry, a native of Elmont, N.Y., has been the coach at Long Island for 10 years, leading the team into the NCAA Tournament the past two seasons. Long Island won Northeast Conference regular-season and tournament championships in 2011 and '12.
Long Island's 2011 NEC title was the school's first in 14 years. The Blackbirds were 25-9 this year, with four underclassmen in the starting lineup.
During the past few seasons at Long Island, Ferry has recruited well in Texas, bringing four natives of that state to Brooklyn. Included in that group is 6-foot-7, 230-pound junior forward Julian Boyd, the NEC Player of the Year, an honorable mention Associated Press All-American and the Blackbirds' leading scorer (17.4 points per game). Sophomore guard Jason Brickman, who averaged 9.6 points, and juniors Brandon Thompson and Kenny Onyechi also grew up in Texas.
Ferry compiled a 150-149 record at Long Island. He also was named conference Coach of the Year in 2005 and '11.
Ferry presided over another makeover of the program in 2007 when Long Island moved into the $45 million Wellness, Recreation and Athletic Center where the Blackbirds have a .690 winning percentage.
Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.