Share This Page

Texas Tech rallies for 37-27 win over WVU

| Saturday, Oct. 19, 2013, 3:51 p.m.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
Texas Tech quarterback Davis Webb (7) scrambles away from West Virginia linebacker Isaiah Bruce (31) during the second quarter Saturday, Oct. 19, 2013, at Milan Puskar Stadium in Morgantown, W.Va. Texas Tech defeated West Virginia, 37-27.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. — There are reasons why some teams win and others lose, and Texas Tech's 37-27, come-from-behind victory against West Virginia before 54,804 fans at Milan Puskar Stadium on Saturday afternoon was the perfect example.

Perhaps it is best explained in comments from each head coach.

“Fortune favors the bold,” said Kliff Kingsbury, Texas Tech's first-year head coach.

“We didn't have the fight and the will to want to win,” said West Virginia's Dana Holgorsen.

That provided the essence of a game that West Virginia could have won, believes it should have won, but didn't win because it shut down at the end while true freshman quarterback Davis Webb and tight end Jace Amaro simply outfought the Mountaineers down the stretch.

The unbeaten Red Raiders, ranked 16th in the nation, trailed 27-16 late in the third quarter before scoring 21 unanswered points on two 1-yard touchdown runs by Kenny Williams and a 10-yard TD pass from Webb to Amaro to put away a seventh consecutive victory.

Webb completed 36 of 50 passes for 462 yards and two touchdowns without an interception.

“We're not going to leave it up to anyone else,” Kingsbury said. “We knew it was up to him to make good throws, and today he did that.”

“I can't believe the efficiency with which that guy throws the ball,” said WVU defensive coordinator Keith Patterson. “It looks like he's been the starting quarterback since Aug. 1.”

Instead, it was Webb's second start, replacing Baker Mayfield, who injured his knee against Kansas.

Amaro, a 6-foot-5, 260-pound tight end, was no secret to West Virginia coming into the game. A year ago, he caught five passes for 156 yards and a touchdown against them before exiting for the season with an injury.

In this game, he caught nine passes for 136 yards and both of Webb's TD passes.

“He said to put it on his shoulders for the second half, so that's what I did,” Kingsbury said. “I told him we were going to get a lot of balls to him. When they went up by 11, the ball went his way and he kept making plays. His size, speed and determination are a deadly combination.”

“He's a matchup nightmare,” Holgorsen said.

WVU's ground game took control of the game through the second and third quarters, as Dreamius Smith made two strong runs of 38 and 12 yards for touchdowns, finishing as the game's leading rusher with 89 yards.

Clint Trickett completed 27 of 43 passes for 254 yards and a touchdown for West Virginia.

Late in the third quarter, WVU led, 27-16, but the Red Raiders had all the answers the rest of the way.

“They had enough fight and will to make enough plays to win the game in the end. We did not have that,” Holgorsen said. “We felt good mid-third quarter when we were up 27-16, but the game wasn't over. We refused to make a play on offense, defense or special teams the last quarter and a half. We refused to coach well enough to win the game. That will be addressed.”

The Red Raiders roared back, driving 80 yards to score on a 1-yard run by Williams to make it 27-23.

Another 1-yard burst by Williams early in the fourth quarter regained the lead for Texas Tech, and then Amaro caught his second TD pass with 61 seconds left to clinch it.

Bob Hertzel is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.