Pitt dominates Wake Forest, gets set for game against North Carolina
GREENSBORO, N.C. – Jamie Dixon doesn't know whether a 29-point victory over Wake Forest in Pitt's inaugural ACC Tournament game or 24 victories, half of them in the ACC, will get his Panthers into the NCAA Tournament.
Nor does the Pitt coach care.
What Dixon does know and care about is that his Panthers are finally healthy and playing their best basketball of the season.
That was evident in fifth-seeded Pitt's 84-55 victory over No. 12 seed Wake Forest on Thursday in a second-round game before 21,533 at Greensboro Coliseum.
“We've done a great job of that down the stretch,” Dixon said. “We had our two best players playing at not even close to full speed.”
Pitt (24-8), which has won four of its past five games, advanced to the quarterfinals at 2 p.m. Friday against fourth-seeded North Carolina (23-8). The Tar Heels defeated the Panthers, 75-71, Feb. 15 in Chapel Hill.
“It's a big motivation, especially after they beat you,” Pitt star Lamar Patterson said. “You want to get that ‘W' back.”
That Patterson and fellow fifth-year senior Talib Zanna, bothered by midseason injuries, dominated the Demon Deacons was a promising sign for the Panthers. Pitt's 39 first-half points were its second-most in ACC play — it had 40 in an 80-65 victory over Wake Forest on Jan. 11 — and provided a 14-point halftime margin.
“They hit us right between the eyes,” Wake Forest coach Jeff Bzdelik said, “and we were on our heels throughout the entire game.”
Patterson, a second-team All-ACC pick, scored a game-high 24 points on 8 of 13 shooting, including four 3s, with five rebounds, four assists and two steals.
Zanna, an All-ACC honorable mention, scored 15 of his 17 points in the first half in his most complete game of the season: 8 of 10 shooting, with nine rebounds, three assists, three steals and a blocked shot.
“To have everybody as healthy as they are is truly a blessing for us,” sophomore point guard James Robinson said. “Our seniors are carrying us. We just want to keep winning for them.”
Pitt went through a span where it lost four of six games after Zanna injured his right ankle in a last-second loss to Virginia and Patterson hurt the thumb on his right (shooting) hand at Miami.
Zanna became less effective, as he struggled to finish inside. He has averaged 15.2 points in the last five games.
“It was really hurting,” Zanna said, “and I couldn't do nothing about it.”
Patterson averaged 21.4 points over the past five games.
“It makes a big difference,” Patterson said. “At the time, I probably would have said it's not making a difference but it definitely is. I'm more confident. I don't feel pain when I catch the ball or pass the ball or shoot it. I feel at my best right now, and I think everyone feels the same way. Mentally, I think we're at our best, also.”
Now, Pitt has a chance to answer its critics who continue to challenge its NCAA Tournament resume by pointing out that the Panthers have yet to beat a ranked opponent. North Carolina is ranked No. 15, and the Tar Heels had a 12-game winning streak before losing their finale at Duke.
“Watching ESPN, they keep saying, ‘Pittsburgh is on the bubble,' ” Zanna said. “We're not worried about it. It is a motivation. If we take care of our business in this ACC Tournament, they're all going to look bad in what they say.
“So, we're not even worried about it. Our goal is to win this ACC Tournament, just to make a statement.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Hackers’ new Dyre malware infects W.Pa. computers, vexes FBI cyber agents
- Ford City’s teamwork, emotion take center stage in semifinal win over Freeport
- Penguins assistant coach Tocchet wants Letang to shoot more on power play
- Gorman: Billy Holt’s big moment for Albert Gallatin
- Pirates likely to seek pitcher, catcher when free agency starts
- LaBar: Updated WWE Network numbers, its future
- Pitt, IUP to experiment with 30-second shot clock
- ‘Big play’ moniker fits veteran Steelers cornerback Gay
- City rivals Allderdice, Brashear seeking elusive title
- Friends take to social media to recall Herminie teen
- Homewood welcomes nonprofit Animal Rescue League’s new shelter, clinic