WVU women whip Albany, advance to second round
BATON ROUGE, La. — West Virginia's backcourt duo of Christal Caldwell and Bria Holmes left coach Mike Carey confident about the Mountaineers chances of making program history in the NCAA women's tournament.
Caldwell scored 26 points, Holmes added 20, and second-seeded West Virginia defeated Albany, 76-61, in the opening round Sunday, setting up a second-round matchup Tuesday night with host LSU, the No. 7 seed.
Averee Fields added 10 points for West Virginia (30-4), now one victory from its first ever appearance in the Sweet 16.
“We attacked the basket and did what we are supposed to do,” Carey said. “We passed the ball extremely well.”
Megan Craig led the 15th-seeded Great Danes (28-5) with 23 points. But the 6-foot-9 center was hampered by two quick fouls that limiter her playing time in the first half.
When Craig went to the bench, the Mountaineers went on a 16-2 run to take a 33-11 lead.
“It was more of our defense that was the biggest reason we went on our run like we did,” Holmes said. “It got things going with us offensively and allowed us to score a lot of points quickly when their girl (Craig) went out of the game.”
Indeed, West Virginia's defense held Albany scoreless for nearly six minutes during the run, and the Great Danes never quite recovered.
West Virginia already has set a school record for victories in a season and has its highest ever seeding in an NCAA tournament. Now the Mountaineers have two days to prepare for a virtual road game against an LSU team coming off a commanding 98-78 triumph over Georgia Tech.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.