ShareThis Page

Defending regional champion La Roche ousted; W&J reaches title game

| Friday, May 19, 2017, 7:15 p.m.

The defending regional champion and third-seeded La Roche baseball team went 0-2 in the 2017 NCAA Division III Mideast Regional, getting eliminated by second-seeded SUNY Cortland on Friday at Ross Memorial Park. The Red Dragons defeated the Redhawks, 10-2.

Cortland senior Steven Figueroa provided the offensive spark, going 3 for 5 with two home runs and six RBIs. He hit a three-run home run in the second and the fourth innings, his first two homers of the season.

Jeff Cooke was the second pitcher in as many days to throw a complete game against La Roche, allowing only two runs on eight hits and striking out seven.

Luis Navedo was the bright spot for the Redhawks' offense, going 2 for 4 with a home run and two RBIs.

W&J wins again

Washington & Jefferson's high-powered offense continued to shine at the 2017 NCAA Mideast Regional, as the fourth-seeded Presidents advanced to the winner's bracket championship game with a 15-6 win against eighth-seeded Earlham College at Ross Memorial Park on Friday.

“Another good day for the Presidents,” Washington & Jefferson coach Jeff Mountain said. “A lot of fight out of the guys. That is how we have been from the beginning. It is always good when you get out to a good start.”

Senior Nick Vento, a Franklin Regional graduate, had a game to remember, going 4 for 6 with seven RBIs, four of those coming on his second-inning grand slam to give the Presidents (36-10) the lead for good. Adam LaRue, a West Allegheny graduate, had his second four-hit game in a row out of the leadoff spot.

Freshman Ben Marsico, a North Allegheny graduate, picked up his first collegiate win. Marsico went four innings in relief, allowing only two hits.

Drew Karpen is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.