ShareThis Page

St. Vincent football loses homecoming game to No. 18 Case Western

| Saturday, Sept. 30, 2017, 7:51 p.m.
St. Vincent fans gather to watch Saturday's homecoming game between the Bearcats and visiting Case Western.
St. Vincent fans gather to watch Saturday's homecoming game between the Bearcats and visiting Case Western.

They congregated in packs at tailgates, on hillsides and in passageways all around Chuck Noll Field on a strikingly beautiful fall day at St. Vincent.

Many were here for homecoming Saturday to get a glimpse of the present-day St. Vincent football team, hoping to stir memories of the Bearcats' national championship victory over Emory & Henry nearly 67 years ago in the 1950 Tangerine Bowl.

What they witnessed was a 35-14 defeat to No. 18 Case Western Reserve, a decidedly stronger Division III opponent.

“Schools like Case Western Reserve and Carnegie Mellon offer a different perspective in academics,” St. Vincent coach Ron Dolciato said. “They can more easily draw players from all over the country because of it.

“We get players from a lot of places, but it's a process.”

Case and CMU entered the day tied for first place in the Presidents' Athletic Conference and kept pace with victories Saturday.

While some schools have established success as a way of life in football, homecoming at St. Vincent, as predictable as it may sound, was a celebration of the past and hope for the future on the gridiron.

“We sold more tickets today (2,476) than for any other game in our (recent) history,” said Jeff Zidek, an athletics department spokesman, who said the figure did not take into account attendance for games before the discontinuation of the school's varsity program in 1963.

Zidek also noted there have been larger crowds since the program was revived in 2007 to include fans in areas away from the main grandstand, where admission is free.

Though St. Vincent (2-3, 1-2) lost its second game in a row, Dolciato remained hopeful that the Bearcats' drive to rebuild a football tradition will accelerate.

“We've been successful in changing the culture here, but the kids have to believe,” said Dolciato, a former associate head coach and offensive coordinator at John Carroll. “Football has to be important, and it is to a certain extent. But I thought by now, we'd be competing for a PAC championship.”

Dolciato's record midway through his fourth season as coach at St. Vincent is 15-20.

Rob Cuda completed 19 of 30 passes for 357 yards and four touchdowns to lead Case Western Reserve (4-0, 3-0), which led 21-0 at halftime on the strength of Cuda's first three TD passes: 13 yards to Jacob Burke, 6 yards to Aaron Aguilar and 32 yards to Luke DiFrancesco.

The Spartans made it 28-0 during the first minute of the fourth quarter when Cuda scored on a 4-yard run.

When St. Vincent finally scored with 10 minutes, 23 seconds remaining on a 1-yard run by Jhanard Dorsett, the crowd stirred. But Cuda's fourth TD pass of 38 yards to Joey Spitalli about 2 minutes later gave Case Western Reserve a 35-7 advantage.

Michael Navarro, who started at quarterback for St. Vincent in the team's first four games before Dolciato replaced him this week with Zavion Thompson, threw a 22-yard scoring pass to Damon Black Jr. to account for the Bearcats' other touchdown.

Navarro, who suffered an upper body injury against Grove City last week, relieved Thompson to start the second half and completed 17 of 20 passes for 202 yards, and Black finished with nine receptions for 131 yards.

Dave Mackall is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.