ShareThis Page

IUP holds on to beat Assumption, advances to D2 football semifinals

Paul Schofield
| Saturday, Dec. 2, 2017, 7:48 p.m.

When Assumption quarterback Cody Williams lofted a Hail Mary pass toward the end zone on the final play of Saturday's Division II Super Region One championship at Miller Stadium, everyone in the attendance stood and watched.

When IUP defensive back John McDonald-Horner knocked down the pass intended for Ashton Grant, IUP players celebrated, fans erupted and the Assumption players fell to the turf in disbelief.

IUP held off a last minute drive to defeat Assumption, 27-22, and advance to the NCAA semifinals against West Florida at home at noon Saturday. It is IUP's first trip to the national semifinals since 1993.

“The ball seemed to float in the air forever,” IUP defensive back Takhi Turner said. “I didn't know what to expect, but I had confidence with the people on the field. When I saw the ball hit the turf, it brought joy and I never had a better feeling before.”

Moments before the final play, it was the Assumption players who were celebrating what they thought was a winning score when Williams scrambled out of the pocket and launched a 44-yard score to Grant.

But as Williams scrambled up the field, he crossed the line of scrimmage and was flagged for an illegal forward pass.

“When he broke free, I thought he was going to run for 20 yards,” IUP coach Paul Tortorella said. “When I saw he was passed the line of scrimmage by a good 2 yards and the official threw the flag, I didn't care what happened. I knew it was coming back.”

Williams said he thought he hadn't crossed the line but had confidence they still had a chance to score.

The last-minute drive came after IUP put together a 6 minute, 10 second drive to take the lead. It was freshman Duane Brown scoring from the 1 with 1:09 left to cap a 13-play, 76-yard drive.

“I told them that we could not settle for a field goal. We had to score,” Tortorella said. “Our team is built for December football.”

IUP (13-0) rushed for 340 yards, led by freshman Justice Evans, who rushed for 167 yards on 21 carries. Brown, who scored two touchdowns, and sophomore Samir Bullock, who scored once, each rushed for 59 yards. Junior quarterback Lenny Williams added 55 yards rushing.

“With our line, we tend to where down defenses,” Tortorella said. “Turnovers and penalties slowed us down in the first half.”

IUP won despite turning the ball over four times and giving up an onsides kick in the first half. Lenny Williams was intercepted three times, including one that was returned 35 yards for a score by Joe Kim in the second quarter.

The Crimson Hawk defense also forced Assumption (11-2) to kick three field goals when the Greyhounds got inside IUP's 5.

“Forcing them to kick field goals won this game,” Tortorella said. “That was a great football game.

“Assumption really didn't deserve to lose as hard as it played, and we refused to lose. We just wouldn't be denied. Our guys wouldn't let us lose.”

IUP, despite its woes in the first half, took a 14-13 lead into halftime as Bullock scored from the 1 and Williams connected on a 25-yard strike to Chris Wuestner.

Right before halftime, Williams had a pass deflect off a receiver's fingers and to Assumption's Andrew Benson at the 4.

Assumption wide receiver Deonte Harris had six catches for 66 yards, all in the first half. He didn't catch a pass in the second half.

“Settling for field goals inside the 5 came back to hurt us,” Assumption coach Bob Chesney said. “IUP just has too much speed and power. It was tough slowing them down.”

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at pschofield@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.