ShareThis Page

Slippery Rock's Marcus Martin becomes first Hendricks Award finalist from Division II

| Friday, Dec. 1, 2017, 6:02 p.m.
West Mifflin graduate Marcus Martin broke the all-division record for sacks this season.
Slippery Rock athletics
West Mifflin graduate Marcus Martin broke the all-division record for sacks this season.

Slippery Rock senior Marcus Martin made more history Friday when he became the first NCAA Division II player to be named a finalist for the Ted Hendricks Award, which is given annually to the best defensive end in college football.

The other four finalists are N.C. State's Bradley Chubb, Ohio State's Nick Bosa, Clemson's Clelin Ferrell and Northern Illinois' Sutton Smith. The winner will be announced Wednesday.

Martin, a West Mifflin graduate, led the nation with 15 12 sacks and 26 12 tackles for loss this season and broke the all-divisions career record with 56 sacks.

He won the Gene Upshaw Division II Lineman of the Year and is one of the 13 finalists across all divisions for the William V. Campbell Trophy, which is the equivalent of the Academic Heisman Trophy.

Alabama's Jonathan Allen won the Hendricks Award last season, and previous winners include Terrell Suggs, LaMarr Woodley and Jadeveon Clowney.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.