ShareThis Page
District Colleges

Holmberg earns silver medal, sets record

Paul Schofield
| Sunday, May 13, 2018, 9:12 a.m.
Penn State's Maddie Holmberg competes in the heptathlon 100-meter hurdles during Day 1 of the Big Ten Track and Field Championships on May 12 at Penn State.
Penn State Athletics
Penn State's Maddie Holmberg competes in the heptathlon 100-meter hurdles during Day 1 of the Big Ten Track and Field Championships on May 12 at Penn State.

Penn State junior Maddie Holmberg set a school record by finishing second in the heptathlon at the Big 10 Outdoor Track & Field Championships on Saturday at Indiana University.

Holmberg (Hempfield) competed in the long jump, javelin and 800 during the second day of competition. She jumped 20 feet, 10 34 inches in the long jump, tying the third best performance in school history.

“It feels really good,” Holmberg said on her heptathlon competition in a release. “I always say, ‘You make history or you become history' and I made history today.

“It is really cool because Gayle Hunter the previous school record holder was just a stud, a phenomenal athlete and went on to do really great things and I am hoping that I can follow in her footsteps.”

Holmberg then followed up her personal-best leap with a personal-best toss of 142-2 in the javelin throw for 732 points, and she ended by running 2:20.55 in the 800-meter run for 816 points.

She garnered a silver medal with a Penn State school-record score of 5,976 points. The previous school record of 5,797 in the heptathlon was set by Gayle Hunter at the 2009 NCAA Championships.

Holmberg also competed in the women's long jump and placed eighth with her mark of 20- 34.

Paul Schofield is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at pschofield@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Schofield_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me