College notebook: St. Vincent women's tennis earns NCAA bid
College Football Videos
The St. Vincent women's tennis team earned the Presidents' Athletic Conference's automatic bid to the NCAA Division III Tournament in Kalamazoo, Mich., after finishing in a tie with Westminster (Pa.) for first place at the PAC championships Saturday in Erie.
Both teams accumulated 49 points, but St. Vincent was awarded its first postseason bid because of its 6-3 regular-season win over Westminster.
First-year St. Vincent coach Chris McMahon was named PAC Coach of the Year after leading the Bearcats to a 14-0 regular-season record, which included a 9-0 mark in the PAC.
Earning wins in the PAC championships for St. Vincent were top-seeded Jessica McKetta, 6-2, 6-0, over third-seeded Christine Bullock of Geneva at No. 5 singles; top-seeded Kylie Auman, 6-1, 6-3, over second-seeded Beth Ekimoff of Westminster at No. 6 singles; and top-seeded McKetta and Auman, 9-7, over second-seeded Jane Larson and Ekimoff of Westminster at No. 3 doubles.
Grove City College, which had won the previous 25 PAC championships, finished third in team scoring with 34 points.
The 2013 D-III Tournament will be May 20-25 at Kalamazoo College.
Quite a challenge
The St. Vincent men's basketball team will open its regular-season schedule Nov. 16 at Virginia Wesleyan, which is ranked No. 1 in NCAA Division III in a preseason poll conducted by D-III News and No. 2 by D3hoops.com.
“It's an exciting way to start the year,” St. Vincent coach DP Harris said. “This game gives us an opportunity to get ready for conference play.”
The Bearcats' first scheduled PAC game is Dec. 1 against visiting Westminster. They are scheduled to begin play Nov. 1 with an exhibition game at Division I Robert Morris.
St. Vincent returns its top five scorers from a 19-8 team that was 11-5 in the PAC, led by senior guard Dennis Bassich, who averaged 16.7 points.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.