ShareThis Page

IUP, W&J to compete in NCAA football tourneys

| Sunday, Nov. 11, 2012, 6:48 p.m.
Barry Reeger | Tribune-Review
IUP wide receiver Terrill Barnes breaks away from Shippensburg cornerback Avery Coleman to score on a 48-yard touchdown pass in the first quarter of the PSAC Championship game Saturday, Nov. 10, 2012, at IUP's George P. Miller Stadium. Barnes caught three touchdown passes as IUP defeated Shippensburg, 41-10, to become PSAC champions.

Indiana (Pa.)'s decisive victory in the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference title game Saturday improved the Crimson Hawks' credibility in the eyes of the NCAA's Division II selection committee, but it failed to deliver the team a full array of postseason perks.

The 41-10 home blowout of Shippensburg allowed IUP (10-1), fifth in last week's Super Region One rankings, to receive the No. 3 seed in the regional bracket, which was released Sunday night.

The Crimson Hawks, playoff qualifiers for the first time since 2007, earned a home game to start the 24-team tournament. They'll host No. 6 Shepherd (8-2), the West Virginia Intercollegiate Athletic Conference champion, on Saturday.

IUP coach Curt Cignetti proved himself capable as a prognosticator after his Crimson Hawks dominated Shippensburg (10-1), which entered the title game as the top team in the Super Region One rankings but fell to No. 4 in the bracket.

“You never know with the seedings, but we were No. 5, and we beat No. 1 pretty decisively, so I would think we'd bump up to some sort of home-field advantage,” Cignetti said following the championship win. “I would think that we'd get a No. 2 or 3.”

With a first-round win, IUP would advance to meet No. 2 New Haven (10-0).

Winston-Salem (11-0) received the top spot in the Super Region One. Other regional No. 1 seeds include Colorado State-Pueblo (11-0), Valdosta State (8-2) and Minnesota State-Mankato (11-0).

No other teams from the PSAC West division, including co-champ Mercyhurst (9-2), were selected.

Division III

Washington & Jefferson's upset win over Waynesburg in the final week of the regular season altered the fate of both teams.

The Presidents (8-2), who won, 31-14, on the road, claimed the Presidents' Athletic Conference championship because of their head-to-head edge over the Yellow Jackets, earning an automatic bid to the Division III playoffs. They drew a first-round matchup with Centennial Conference champ Johns Hopkins (9-1), which will host the game Saturday.

Waynesburg (9-1), a team ranked No. 13 in the country prior to the loss to W&J Saturday, not only watched its conference title hopes disappear but also squandered a playoff spot. The Yellow Jackets did not grab one of the eight at-large berths in the 32-team tournament.

Bill West is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-543-1303.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.