Seton Hill baseball team ranked No. 27 nationally
College Football Videos
The Seton Hill University baseball team has been ranked No. 27 in the Collegiate Baseball News preseason poll.
The Griffins, who have made three consecutive NCAA Division II tournament regional appearances, are coming off a 46-11 season (30-4 West Virginia Intercollegiate Athletic Conference) and have won the past three West Virginia Intercollegiate Athletic Conference North Division titles.
Defending national champion West Chester enters the season as the top-ranked team in the poll.
Seton Hill opens the 2013 season with a three-game series Feb. 16 at No. 7 Francis Marion.
Seton Hill seniors Calsie Boyd and Aron Kurzinski were among those to earn the first weekly track and field honors in the WVIAC.
Boyd was named female field athlete of the week, and Kurzinski earned male field athlete of the week.
At the Tiffin University Open, Boyd won the high jump with a distance of 5 feet, 6 inches and the triple jump with a 38- 3⁄4, and Kurzinski set a Seton Hill indoor record in the long jump with a leap of 24-1.
All three marks represent NCAA Provisional qualifying distances.
The Seton Hill men's and women's basketball teams posted victories during recent trips to Puerto Rico.
Both teams went 2-0 in games at San Juan.
The men beat Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, 60-52, and Puerto Rico-Bayamon, 62-56, to improve to 5-3 heading into a scheduled WVIAC game on Monday at West Virginia Wesleyan.
The women's team defeated Puerto Rico-Bayamon, 73-67, and Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras. The Griffins (6-4) host Notre Dame (Ohio) on Saturday.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.