Share This Page

District roundup: WVU falls at Oklahoma State

| Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, 9:20 p.m.

STILLWATER, Okla. — Freshman Phil Forte scored a career-high 26 points, Markel Brown added 24 and Oklahoma State (13-5, 3-3 Big 12) rallied from 13 points down to rout West Virginia, 80-66, on Saturday.

Eron Harris scored 17 points to lead the Mountaineers (9-10, 2-4), who never got closer than 11 over the final 10 minutes.

“They made shots that we didn't,” WVU coach Bob Huggins said. “We kind of helped them.”

No. 14 Ohio State 65, Penn State 51 – In University Park, Sam Thompson scored 16 points on 6-of-7 shooting, and Ohio State (15-4, 5-2 Big Ten) took advantage of cold-shooting Penn State.

Jermaine Marshall scored 16 points for the Nittany Lions (8-12, 0-8), who lost their 18th in a row to the Buckeyes.

Women

No. 24 Iowa State 53, West Virginia 49 — In Morgantown, W.Va., Hallie Christofferson had 23 points as Iowa State (14-4, 5-3 Big 12) topped West Virginia (11-8, 3-5).

Georgetown 69, Pitt 57 — In Washington, Brianna Kiesel had 22 points and a career-high 10 rebounds, but Pitt (9-10, 0-6) lost its 26th Big East regular-season game in a row, falling to Georgetown (12-8, 3-4).

Robert Morris 61, Mount St. Mary's 59 — Freshman guard Lou Mataly scored a season-high 22 points, capped by a game-winning basket with 1.9 seconds to play as Robert Morris (4-14, 3-4 Northeast Conference) beat Mount St. Mary's (8-10, 4-3) at Sewall Center.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.