Share This Page

Local college notes: St. Vincent athletes named to honor roll

| Tuesday, Jan. 29, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

A total of 36 St. Vincent College student-athletes have been named to the Presidents' Athletic Conference Academic Honor Roll for the fall 2012 semester for attaining a grade-point average of at least 3.6 during the period.

Cross country men: Lucas Briola, Sawyer Palonder and Justin Petrovich.

Cross country women: Megan Blake, Gloria Bullock (Greensburg Salem), Genie Fratto, Emily Helbling, Kayla Kuntz, Allyson Lambert, Rebecca Leonard, Alicia Pytlak and Beth Anne Wieber.

Football: Zach Capobianco, Domenic DeYulis, James Haggerty, Alex Peffley and Sam Walters.

Soccer men: Robert Tokarski.

Soccer women: Elly Colvin, Catherine Czapski, Kelsey Farrand, Emily Johns, Cassie Overly (Hempfield) and Rebecca Sandor.

Tennis women: Kylie Auman, Amanda Gans, Amanda Marker, Jessica McKetta, Stephanie Rubin and Regina Woloshun.

Volleyball women: Anna Christy, Katie Kohler, Megan Lucas, Jordan Pogue, Ariel Rocco and Emily Rosati.

Players of the week

St. Vincent College had two basketball players honored by the Presidents' Athletic Conference Monday as athletes of the week. Junior guard Isaac Turner averaged 16 points, 4 rebounds, 3.5 assists and 2 steals, as the SVC men went 2-0 last week. Senior forward Devin McGrath (OLSH), a player of the year candidate, averaged 16 points, 12.5 rebounds, 6.5 assists, 3.5 blocks and 3 steals, shooting 50 percent in two games last week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.