Share This Page

Campus clippings: Burrell graduate Walsh doubles up for Lehigh

| Monday, Feb. 4, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Wrestling

Most college wrestlers never get a chance to pull an upset.

Lehigh senior wrestler Shane Welsh did it twice on back-to-back days.

Welsh, a Burrell graduate, took down two nationally ranked opponents in a pair of recent matches to earn Eastern Intercollegiate Wrestling Association Wrestler of the Week honors.

The defending EIWA champion at 149 pounds, Welsh entered last weekend's action unranked but defeated No. 9-ranked Nick Lester of Oklahoma, 3-2, and No. 7 Scott Sakaguchi of Oregon State, 7-5, in consecutive matches.

Welsh is 12-5 this season.

Men's basketball

Pitt-Greensburg

Sophomore Brian Heinle (St. Joseph) and freshman Mike Connelly (St. Joseph) have been key backcourt players for the Bobcats (9-12). Heinle is averaging 10.1 points, 5.4 rebounds and 1.7 assists, while Connelly's statline includes 7.1 points and 2.1 rebounds per game.

Heinle has scored in double figures in nine games, while Connelly has done so eight times.

Women's basketball

Pitt-Greensburg

Freshman guard Lindsey McKamish (Fox Chapel) has played in 16 games, including six starts for the Lady Bobcats (10-11). She is averaging 2.4 points and 1.8 steals in 17.5 minutes per game. She scored a season-high 11 points against Westminster.

Men's swimming

Penn State Behrend

Senior Clay Altemose (Apollo-Ridge) was a part of three winning events in Behrend's 129 12-124 12 loss to St. Vincent. Altemose won the 100-yard backstroke (52.53 seconds) and 100 butterfly (53.53), and helped the 200 medley relay team to victory.

—Bill Beckner Jr.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.