Campus clippings: Plum's Yurovsky helps Michigan tennis to big wins
Ronit Yurovskyis no stranger to the pressure that comes with big-stage tennis matches.
She won two state singles titles while playing tennis at PlumHigh School and has wasted no time showing she also can compete at the Division I college level.
Yurovsky, a freshman at Michigan, was named the Big Ten Conference Women's Tennis Athlete of the Week after defeating two nationally ranked players in the first two singles matches of her collegiate career.
Yurovsky downed No. 25 Kata Szekeley of Tennessee, 7-6, 6-4, and No. 28 Zoe De Bruycker of North Carolina, 6-1, 3-6, 1-0. Unranked Michigan defeated No. 25 Tennesse, 4-3.
Guards Reece Mabery (Highlands)and Brady Pacific (Kiski Area)have been a part of one of the top senior groups to play for the program, leading the Bison to 80 victories and a 45-7 record at home.
Penn State New Kensington
Sophomore guard Dom Strapac (Leechburg) scored 15 points on five 3-pointers to help lead the Lions to their first win in more than a year. PSNK defeated Penn College, 77-75, on Saturday to move to 1-16 for the season.
Junior forward Jenny Papich (Fox Chapel) is closing in on a milestone. Papich needs 34 points to become the 24th women's player in school history to score 1,000 career points. This season, she is averaging 12.7 points, 5.6 rebounds and 1.9 assists for Gannon (21-3), ranked No. 6 in the country in Division II.
Redshirt sophomore Ryan Siegel (Freeport)is hitting .417 with a pair of RBI through three games for the Lakers (2-1). An outfielder, Siegal transferred from Coastal Carolina.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.