Campus clippings: Local swimmers flourish for Edinboro
Several local swimmers helped the Edinboro University women's team finish fifth at the Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference Championships at Cumberland Valley High School.
Sophomore Staci Schrecongost (Valley) and junior Julie Moretti (Springdale) helped the 400-yard freestyle relay post a school-record time of 3:27.87.
Schrecongost also holds school records in the 200 and 500 freestyles. Her time of 1:52.41 in the 200 is an NCAA B-qualifying and All-PSAC time. Her top 500 is 5:02.42.
Other key team members are sophomore Mackenzie Wargo (Apollo-Ridge) and senior Kayla Joy (Plum).
Penn State Behrend
Senior Clay Altemose (Apollo-Ridge) helped guide the 400-yard freestyle relay team to a time of 3:07.67, breaking Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference, open and meet records, as Behrend captured its seventh straight AMCC title. Altemose also swam for the school record-breaking 200-yard medley relay (1:33.32).
Sophomore David Starr (Plum) was named to the All-Presidents' Athletic Conference second team.
Senior guard Reece Mabery (Highlands) scored a team-high 18 points, and class and backcourt mate Brady Pacific (Kiski Area) added 12 in a 70-64 loss to Washington & Jefferson in the PAC tournament quarterfinals.
Freshman guard Nolan Cressler (Plum) was named Ivy League Rookie of the Week for the second time. He is averaging 8 points and 3.4 rebounds for the Big Red (13-14).
Junior forward Jenny Papich (Fox Chapel) became the fourth Academic All-American at Gannon after being named to the second team. Papich is averaging 13.3 points, 5.6 rebounds and 1.9 assists.
— Bill Beckner Jr.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.