Share This Page

District roundup: Pitt women fall at No. 3 UConn

| Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2013, 10:06 p.m.

District women

No. 3 Connecticut 76, Pittsburgh 36 — In Hartford, Conn., Kaleena Mosqueda-Lewis had 19 points and 13 rebounds to help Connecticut (26-2, 13-1 Big East) close out its home schedule with a rout of Pitt.

Brianna Kiesel had 11 points for Pitt (9-18, 0-14), which has now lost 13 games in a row and 34 consecutive games in regular-season Big East play.

The win was the 28th straight for the Huskies over Pitt, a team they haven't lost to in 20 years.

Pitt took an 8-7 edge, but UConn went on a 26-3 run and led 37-13 at halftime.

West Virginia 66, Kansas State 57 — In Morgantown, W. Va., Ayana Dunning and Christal Caldwell each scored 15 points as West Virginia (17-10, 9-7 Big 12) rallied to beat Kansas State.

Brittany Chambers scored 36 points for Kansas State (13-15, 4-12), which led 31-23 at halftime.

Rutgers 68, South Florida 56 — In Piscataway, N.J., C. Vivian Stringer, a Fayette County native and Slippery Rock University graduate, became the fourth women's college basketball coach to reach 900 wins as Rutgers (15-12, 6-8 Big East) cruised past South Florida (19-8, 8-6).

Stringer joined Pat Summitt, Jody Conradt and Sylvia Hatchell. Mike Krzyzewski, Bob Knight and Jim Boeheim have done it on the men's side.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.