Brandon Cunningham scored 25 points, and David Winns tallied 16 points to go along with 16 rebounds, as the 10th-seeded Penn State Fayette men's basketball team defeated seventh-seeded Vermont Technical College, 79-66, in a USCAA Tournament preliminary-round game Wednesday at Penn State Fayette.
James Pratt scored 15 points for the Roaring Lions (15-12).
Penn State Fayette will host second-seeded Andrews University at 2 p.m. Thursday.
Brandon Matano scored 25 points, and Kyle Kissenberth scored 12 points for Vermont Technical College (21-10). The Knights will play Albany College of Pharmacy in a consolation game at 1:15 p.m. Thursday.
— Staff reports
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.