Local roundup: PS Fayette moves to national semifinals
College Football Videos
The Penn State Fayette men's basketball team advanced to the United States Collegiate Athletic Association semifinals by defeating second-seeded Andrews University, 67-61, in a quarterfinal game Thursday at Penn State Fayette.
The 10th-seeded Roaring Lions trailed, 33-21, at the half, but outscored Andrews, 46-28 in the second half. Brandon Cunningham led the Roaring Lions (16-12) with 22 points. James Pratt connected for 18 points. David Winns tallied 13 points and pulled down 14 rebounds.
Penn State Fayette will host third-seeded Berkeley College in a semifinal at 3 p.m. Friday.
Jerome Murray led Andrews (19-8) with 17 points. Matthew Little scored 15 points, and Tyler Wooldridge added 13 points. Andrews will play Penn State York in a consolation game at 10 a.m. Friday at Penn State Fayette.
Penn State Fayette 86, Central Maine Community College 78 — Kasey Ruble scored 23 points and added 12 rebounds, and Shannon Flament notched 13 points and 12 rebounds as the eighth-seeded Roaring Lions (14-10) defeated top-seeded Central Maine Community College in a USCAA first-round game at Penn State Fayette.
Caitlin Wontroba scored 17 points, and Tara Neely followed with 16 points. Kaitlyn Novak scored 11 points. Penn State Fayette will host Berkeley College in a semifinal game at 7 p.m. Friday.
Maggie Sabine led Central Maine Community College with 26 points and 14 rebounds.
Nohemy Aguila tallied 17 points, and Danielle McCusker posted 15 points. Susie French pulled in 10 rebounds.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.