Top junior college scorer commits to Duquesne
College Football Videos
Tra'Vaughn White, the nation's leading scorer among top junior college players, committed to Duquesne on Friday.
The 5-foot-10 guard averaged 25.9 points and 5.5 rebounds as a sophomore at Independence Community College in Kansas. His visit to Duquesne in late March encouraged White to become the fourth member of Jim Ferry's second recruiting class.
“The whole coaching staff showed a lot of love,” said White, who liked the Dukes' offensive approach. “They're pretty much wide open, so I felt like I could fit that style of play.”
White was the second recruit to pick Duquesne in the past two weeks. Cleveland native Desmond Ridenour, a 6-1 guard at Mack Academy in Charlotte, N.C., committed March 23. Before attending prep school, Ridenour had committed to Dayton.
White ranked first among NJCAA Division I scorers this season, just ahead of Santa Fe College's Bobby Hunter, who averaged 25.2 points. White, of Kansas City, Kan., had committed to Sam Houston State in 2011 before enrolling instead at the junior college in Independence, Kan.
“He's an explosive player who's hard to stop,” Independence coach Tony Turner said. “He can get to the rim. And it doesn't matter who's there, he can get right over the top of anybody.”
White and Ridenour can sign letters of intent April 17, along with Jordan Robinson, a 6-7 forward at Quality Education Academy in North Carolina, who committed in late February. Isaiah Watkins, a 6-8 forward for St. Benedict's Prep in New Jersey, signed with the Dukes during the early period in November.
The program also has added Highlands graduate Micah Mason, a transfer from Drake.
The Dukes, who graduated two seniors and lost P.J. Torres midseason, would add two more available scholarships should centers Derrick Martin and Martins Abele transfer as expected. The program has not yet confirmed their departures.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.