Jefferson Hills man notches his 200th career victory as Vulcans' hockey coach
College Football Videos
Justin Berger continues to rack up the milestones as head coach of the California University Vulcans men's hockey program.
Berger, a Jefferson Hills resident, recorded his 200th career victory last month when California finished its 2012-13 season with a 6-5 victory against Iowa State.
Berger, in eight seasons as the Vulcans' head coach, has posted a 200-30-0-6-3 overall record, with a 15-6-0-3 mark in the ACHA Division III National Tournament, and a 21-2-0-1 slate in the College Hockey East playoffs.
He has won seven College Hockey East playoff championships, six Kaliena Cup titless, five Atlantic Region championships and one ACHA Division III national championship.
The Vulcans have advanced to the ACHA Division III national tournament six times during Berger's tenure.
Berger also has been the recipient of numerous individual awards.
He is a five-time ACHA Division III Atlantic Region coach of the year, three-time College Hockey East coach of the year, and the 2010-11 ACHA Division III national coach of the year.
Vulcans general manager Jamison Roth has been there for all 200 victories, as both a staff member and player.
“Two hundred wins is truly a remarkable accomplishment, and one that demonstrates Justin's hard work and dedication over the past nine years here at Cal, eight of which serving as the team's head coach,” Roth said. “Much of the program's success on and off the ice can be attributed to Coach Berger.
“His 200 wins is icing on the cake in regards to his achievements here at Cal, including being named ACHA Division III national coach of the year, and the ACHA Division III national championship.”
Story courtesy of California (Pa.) University athletics.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.