Campus Clippings: Yurovsky is Big Ten's top rookie
It's not much of a surprise to anyone who has followed Ronit Yurovsky's blossoming tennis career that she found immediate success in her first season at the University of Michigan.
Her play didn't go unnoticed.
Yurovsky, a Plum graduate, was named the Big Ten Freshman of the Year.
A two-time PIAA champion and three-time WPIAL champion, Yurovsky is the fourth consecutive Michigan freshman to win the award.
This season, she has a team-best 28-7 record in singles and is ranked No. 48 in the country by the ITA.
She won 15 of 16 matches during one stretch and went 9-2 in conference matches, playing 10 times at No. 2 singles for the Wolverines.
Junior Paige Prato (Deer Lakes) ran the anchor leg of the 400-meter relay team that cruised to victory at the Presidents' Athletic Conference Championships at Washington & Jefferson.
The team broke a school record with a time of 48.86 seconds. Prato, the returning champion in the 100 meters, made second-team all-conference in the event this season.
Senior centerJohn Reichenbaugh (Freeport) finished with 27 points (13 goals, 14 assists) this season for the Dukes (19-14).
Freshman third baseman Zarley Zalewski (Valley) is hitting .257 with a pair of home runs and 16 RBI for the Golden Flashes (22-20). Zalewski has started 31 of 35 games he's played.
Senior third baseman Jeff Campbell (Highlands) went 5 for 5 during a doubleheader split against Shepherd (W.Va.). He had three hits in a 6-4 win, which gave coach Todd Williams 400 wins for his career.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.