Share This Page

Campus Clippings: Freeport graduate Mancine shines at Wooster

| Monday, May 27, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

All signs point to Freeport's Jarrod Mancine having a strong senior baseball season at The College of Wooster.

Mancine capped his junior campaign with All-Mid East Region First-Team honors after earning Most Valuable Player honors at the North Coast Athletic Conference Tournament.

An outfielder and leadoff hitter, Mancine had a .733 on-base percentage and seven RBI in the tournament and reached base safely in the Fighting Scots' final 40 games.

In all, he made 44 starts, hit .392, scored 45 runs and drove in 25 for Wooster (33-12), which reached the Mid-East Regional round of the NCAA Division III Tournament.

Two other local players also contributed at Wooster. Junior outfielder Shane Gallagher (Freeport) made 12 starts and played in 35 games, scoring 11 runs and driving in 11.

Junior pitcherZach Klein (Plum) was 1-1 with a 3.98 ERA in 18 appearances.

Women's tennis

Michigan

Big Ten Conference Freshman of the Year Ronit Yurovsky (Plum) reached the second round of the NCAA singles tournament before falling, 6-4, 6-4, to defending champion Nicole Gibbs of Stanford.

Yurovsky finished a team-best 31-9 for the season.

Honors

Penn State Behrend

Senior swimmer Clay Altemose (Apollo-Ridge) was named the recipient of the John Zahniser Scholar-Athlete award, given annually to a male and female student-athlete who excel in sports and in the classroom. Altemose was four-time all-conference selection.

—Bill Beckner Jr.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.