District college notebook: WVU women's soccer features 2 freshmen from Team Canada
College Football Videos
of note• West Virginia soccer player Ashley Lawrence hasn't played a minute of college soccer, but she is so highly regarded that Big 12 coaches named her to the preseason all-conference team. Lawrence, a freshman forward, is a member of Canada's national team along with another incoming freshman, defender Kadeisha Buchanan. The Mountaineers were chosen first in the Big 12 preseason poll.
• Carnegie Mellon women's soccer coach Yon Struble led the U.S. Deaf women's soccer team to its third consecutive gold medal in the Deaflympics in Bulgaria. Struble also coached the team to gold at the World Deaf Football Championship last summer in Turkey.
• The Pitt women's volleyball team opens Aug. 30-31 in the Mizzou Tournament, but one of the team's early-season highlights comes in a match that won't count in the standings. The Panthers will host Polish professional team Tauron MKS Dabrowa Gornicza in the Pitt International Classic at 7 p.m. Sept. 2 at Fitzgerald Field House.
• California (Pa.) senior basketball player Chris Williams and junior Tynell Fortune played five games in Europe with the Global Sports Academy All-Star Team during a trip that ended Monday. The squad, steered by Vulcans coach Bill Brown, also featured eight Division I players. The team went 5-0 against professional teams in Germany and the Czech Republic.
• A few months ago, Ashley Gruber was leading the Penn State Behrend softball team to the NCAA Division III Tournament. Now, she's the interim coach. Gruber will replace Stacy Pondo, who stepped down to focus on her assistant athletic director duties.Gruber was co-Allegheny Mountain Collegiate Conference Player of the Year last season.
— Jeff Vella
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.