Share This Page

Clarion's Clark out for season

| Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013, 1:26 a.m.

Former Highlands standout Gage Clark still has not played a down of college football. And he's been to two different schools.

Clark, a quarterback who transferred from St. Francis (Pa.) to Clarion, was ruled ineligible for this season because he hasn't met academic requirements.

He completed training camp at Clarion and was expected to be redshirted, but the latest development has him thinking ahead to next season.

β€œIt's a messed up situation and it caught everyone off guard,” Clark said. β€œI was unaware of the whole situation. I wish I would have known more and maybe I would have stayed longer at St. Francis. I just wasn't happy there.”

Clark has been told he can play next season and will retain four years of eligibility.

Men's soccer

Waynesburg

Junior goalkeeper Brandon Daughtry (Burrell) made four saves as the Yellow Jackets edged past Franciscan, 2-1, to open the season. Daughtry was an honorable men

Women's soccer

Robert Morris

Senior defender Alexa Sarsfield (Springdale) and junior goalkeeper Becky Schoenecker (Fox Chapel) have helped RMU to its first 3-0 start in school history. Sarsfield had an assist in a 3-1 win over Bucknell. Schoenecker has started all three games and has five saves.

Men's cross country

Pitt

Junior Richie Addison (Plum) was the Panthers' top finisher in the Duquesne Duals at Schenley Park, running a time of 26 minutes, 25.9 seconds to take fifth place.

Women's volleyball

Penn State Behrend

Senior setter Chelsea Magnusen (Plum), the AMCC Preseason Player of the Year, had 23 assists, five aces and five digs in a 3-0 victory over Baldwin-Wallace. She added 11 digs in a win against Wooster.

Women's tennis

Westminster

Freshman Maria Pallone (Valley) contributed to a win at No. 3 doubles as Westminster won its opener, 9-0, over Chatham.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.