The St. Vincent men's basketball team expects nothing less than a repeat of last year's Presidents' Athletic Conference championship season in which the Bearcats went 23-6 overall and 15-1 in the conference.
“We really have all the pieces right now,” coach D.P. Harris said. “I mean we lost Chris (Klimchock, last year's first-team All-PAC starting point guard), which was a huge loss, but at the same time, we have guys that are there to pick it up.”
Klimchock, who averaged 15.3 ppg last season, will be replaced by sophomore JC Howard,
“I think we have a good balance, but I think that our top three front court guys are our strength,” said 6-foot-5 junior forward Sean Kett, who averaged 7.3 points and 5.4 rebounds last season. “I think we all know what the competition is like and how to handle different people.”
With Kett playing alongside 6-foot-5 senior Dillon Stith (11.7 points, 5.2 rebounds and 1.0 block per game last year) and 6-foot-8 junior Grant Latus (7.9 points, 7.0 rebounds and 2.0 blocks), the Bearcats have one of the most physically imposing frontcourts in the PAC.
“Our inside presence is going to be huge,” senior guard Isaac Turner said.
“I think they're really going to disrupt a lot of shots and make it hard for people to finish down low.”
Turner will draw plenty of attention from opposing defenses, and may be the key to the offense's success.
“(Turner) — who certainly is one of the best players, if not the best player in the league — is going to find his shots any which way,” Harris said. “We're fortunate to have five very good players, four who have a lot of experience.”
So it's win or bust for the talented Bearcats.
“From a basketball standpoint, if we stay healthy, anything less than a championship here would be a failure,” Harris said.
“Everybody in October thinks they're going to be good, and that's great. But we know we're going to be good come January and February.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.